SENTINEL
A proposed governance and oversight layer connecting authorization, review, and accountable decisions.
01 / The engineering question
What is this project for?
Specify how a proposed oversight layer could make authorization and review visible to a human owner.
- Inputs
- Proposed mission policy, evidence references and review decisions. No live inputs are connected.
- Outputs
- A research specification is the next proposed artifact. No running service is represented.
02 / Proposed workflow
The research direction
- 01
Define the proposed policy boundary.
- 02
Identify what needs a human decision.
- 03
Specify the evidence an implementation would need to retain.
03 / Source material
Evidence you can inspect.
No independent public implementation evidence is approved for this concept.
No independent implementation evidence is approved. This dossier declares a research concept.
04 / Verification boundary
What this evidence does not prove.
Research direction only. No deployed monitoring, kill switch, enforcement service, or operational authority is claimed.
Source inspection is not an execution test, a security certification, a performance benchmark, or proof of a production deployment.
05 / Next verifiable step
Build the next piece of proof.
Write a public threat model and verifiable control specification.